It can be difficult for local authorities to know whether they are getting value for money from contractors for road asset building and maintenance. At the same time, value for money in delivery of road maintenance services is a major objective for both central and local government.
REG aims to identify and promote procurement and delivery models that will enhance the sector’s ability to obtain value for money; and to gather, moderate and publish examples of good practice procurement. These should help local authorities avoid duplication and “reinventing the wheel”, while making procurement decisions that align with their needs and smart buying aspirations.
Key documents
Delivery models
Road Maintenance Procurement: delivery model guidelines
These guidelines present a selection matrix of key client drivers to help RCAs determine a preferred road maintenance delivery model. If, after using the guidelines, you discover that you need a new delivery model, the following examples from around the country may assist as a starting point when designing your RFP/RFT.
If, after using the guidelines, you discover that you need a new delivery model, the following examples from around the country may assist as a starting point when designing your RFP/RFT.
Traditional model
Ruapehu District Council: road maintenance
Tasman District Council: rural road maintenance
Performance model
Western Bay of Plenty: local road maintenance (RFT)
Western Bay of Plenty: appendices
New Zealand Transport Agency: Network Outcome Contract pro forma maintenance contract
New Zealand Transport Agency: Network Outcome Contract visual intervention guideline
Alliance model
Hamilton City Council: transportation corridor maintenance and renewal
Southland District Council: central area alliance
Waikato District Council: Waikato roads alliance
Framework model
Kaikoura District Council: road maintenance
Other case studies
Mid South Canterbury Roading Collaboration